Thursday, January 19, 2012

Stick to your Kopi ya?

Watching the Youtube of azhar idrus banning coke
and ribena I can't help but be reminded of Wayne
Newton's character in the Bond movie "License to
Kill". Like Newton in the movie, idrus is another
preacher who will most likely derail the common
sense of his followers in due time.

I guess idrus doesn't attend weddings at Felda Merak Kayangan and have
Tapai for dessert?

God gave us a brain for a purpose, to see/listen, evaluate then judge
what is right or wrong with the Quran as our guide and not some
Saturday Night Live standup comedy type preaching. Faith is serious
business, although a private affair between the humble being and Allah
Subhanahuwata'ala, it's still nonetheless serious business. When will
the sensational hungry audience of idrus realize that and go back to
the Quran?

Meanwhile, I suggest they don't drink Coke lah and stick to their
locally brewed Kopi whatever which was brewed in conditions possibly
much less hygienic than say the Coke or Ribena factories.

Isn't hygiene a requirement in Islam? Who's more Islamic then?

--
Sent from my mobile device

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Malay first or Malaysian first?

So much hoo-hah this last week or so with church raids, apostacy and conversion claims alike. Let me keep this post short.

DPM Muhyiddin once said he is Malay first then Malaysian much to the pretense displeasure of the opposition people. I say pretense because that's the answer they wanted to hear to facilitate their constant spinning of facts and downplaying every BN government initiative through their exploitation and twisting of public sentiments. Without a doubt BN has many flaws but that does not entitle anyone to wrong all their rights. The loose coalition that is pakatan itself is equally if not more prone to wrongs than BN.

With all the happenings that have been occurring lately it is safe to assume that the power hungry and pakatan supporting non's are getting bolder and arrogant. No longer is pas the only one in the trio using religion as a political tool, dap has joined the fray with pkr nodding along obediently in a guard dog kind of fashion. pkr's sacking of Zulkifli Noordin is testament enough to pkr's stand on Islamic matters.

Honestly, if you asked me if I'm Malay or Malaysian first I'd say neither! My answer would be MUSLIM FIRST! That said, constitutionally, in Malaysia, Muslims are Malays. By definition any Muslim who views himself as Muslim first would, by default, be Malay first. So, Mr. DPM you answered correctly in my book! While the context of his answer was not so much in the spiritual sense, again by constitutional definition, Muslims are Malays and vice-versa which also means that DPM Muhyiddin is a Muslim first.

Let us put a stop to all these unconstitutional demands and show of arrogance by the power hungry and disruptive nons from pakatan. It is a pity that the ones fighting (non-Mulims) and defending (stupid pas Muslims) now are dumb enough not to see that neither Kit Siang, Guan Eng, Anwar or even Nik Aziz cares a hoot about their faiths and beliefs. They're just being used to incite hatred, create instability, divide the believers of different faiths into groups so that they can fish for votes.

So my dear level headed Muslims please stay true to your Muslim selves and defend our belief to our last breath. We are being challenged right now, do not doubt it for a minute.... and to my level headed non-Muslims who have lived with us in peace for more than half a century, please also stay true to yourselves regardless of your respective faiths. Observe and obey the constitution for what it says: which, in a nutshell, says Islam is the official religion of this country and is not to be challenged fullstop.

Salam Ramadhan....

--
Sent from my mobile device

Monday, July 18, 2011

Using God's name....

I have to be honest. Arguing with pakatan supporters is tiring, not in an intellectually stimulating way but in a long winded stupid kind of way.

You start with a point of argument highlighting pakatan's flaws. They first retaliate with the usual "they didn't do it". Once proven that they did the first twist is then put into action "they apologized". So I guess that makes it all good. Make a huge mistake and then just say sorry. I wonder why the Bukit Bendera Umno guy was judged so badly by pakatan when he brought up the 'pendatang' issue few years back? BN apologized didn't they? Yet the pakatan baffoons are still playing up the 'pendatang' thing till this very day. If pakatan did the same then apologized to their own people that makes it ok, but for others it's not. Has pakatan politicians ever owned up for slandering others with false accusations?

Next, they will move on from the "they apologized" argument to "their intentions were good" and the futher twist to it is that we can't highlight and god forbid judge or make it available for others to judge for themselves the actions of these so-called leaders of our community because judging is only for God to do. Fine. Then perhaps pakatan people should not judge others too. They should not accuse police of being cruel since they don't really know the intentions of the officers during the bersih demo clampdown. And they shouldn't judge either for it is up to god not us mere mortals. In a nutshell, we are not allowed to have an opinion if it goes against them.

Then, when all else fails, the focus is then shifted from the people who actually committed the wrongs and turned against the person who highlighted them. Taking personal shots, condemning the one who highlighted the incident and turning the messenger into the villain. Gone is the attention on the actual wrong doers. It now becomes an argument between the person who highlighted the incident and the one
defending pakatan rakyat.

Lastly, comes the holier-than-thou bullshit of "who are you to judge them? Only god can". God's name is the nuclear bomb of all arguments, intellectual or not, bring that into the picture and people will back off. Simply because God is holy, divine, sacred and not a name people want to drag into arguments, particularly involving certain low and loose moral politicians. Furthermore, for people like me my faith is my business. I don't drag God into petty discussions over the actions of cop-biting photoshop libeling politicians.

The details of the debate will be posted in the next posting.

Right now I'm just baffled at how people can view a certain group as being capable of governing. They're prone to errors mistakes, politicizing issues and even personal tragadies for their own benefit yet their die hard (but pretend to be neutral) supporters will find a thousand and one excuses to clear them. The "nuke" of all excuses being religon or in some cases God himself. Sounds very nik aziz
doesn't it?

Ah well.... No great loss really, except they've lost my potential vote. I will not put a bunch of baffoons into power when they can't even admit to small mistakes. How defensive will they be when they commit biggerones? You make a mistake you apologize. You capitalize on an issue and it backfires you own up to it. Don't drag God into this shit....

More to come....

--
Sent from my mobile device

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Why all this chaos is totally unnecessary....

Back in 1990, the lead opposition party, Parti Melayu Semangat 46 (S46) led two pacts into the General Elections (GE) at the time. The first pact was made between S46 and Pas called Angkatan Perpaduan Ummah (APU) while the second pact consisted of S46, Dap and Pbs of Sabah called Gagasan Rakyat (GR). Given the dissatisfaction of the Malays and certain quarters of the Chinese population in the country, APU and GR made significant inroads into the federal and state legislatures with the number of parliamentary and state seats that they won.

Kelantan was won over from the BN while Sabah BN was defeated by GR. Penang, although still under BN control, was a heavy casualty with Gerakan taking a terrible beating from Dap. Even the Chief Minister at the time, Dr. Lim Chong Eu, was not spared.

The point is, Malaysia has had it's fair share of strong opposition parties before. But while politicking being what it is, the politicians of the time competed at the ballot boxes. And given Dr.M's stronghold over Malaysia at that time, losing two states was very much akin to a political tsunami.

My point is, why do we need street demos? It has well been proven time and time again that Malaysians, well the bulk of us at least, have the common decency to air our frustrations, dissapointments and whatnots come election time.

Bersih cannot claim that it's first demo was what brought about change in the 2008 GE. It was already a foregone conclusion that support for BN was dwindling with sleppy lethargic and lame pak lah at the helm of BN's leadership. Had bersih 2007 not taken place, the outcome of GE 2008 would still be the same.

Fast forward to the present, it is quite clear that the bersih organizers (read puppets of pakatan rakyat (PR)) are hoping that another show of protests would lead to great victory at the ballot boxes once again. That may not necessarily be the case. If their analysis of the level of support was done correctly, they would realize that whatever support they had during GE 2008 was nothing more than protest votes against pak lah. And the protests came in various forms. The outright angry kind, with no regard for future consequences, actually casted their votes for PR parties. While the more subtle but yet still angry ones decided not to vote, myself included.

Bersih 2007 had little or no impact whatsoever to the decisions made at the ballot boxes in GE 2008. And if claims that elections are so blatantly rigged, it is highly illogical that PR could've retained Kelantan and won four additional states while crippling Kuala Lumpur as well. Believe me, Malaysians are mature enough to decide what they want. All this talk about cleaning up elections is hogwash, the hidden agenda is their main concern. Which is to cause chaos and disruption. To push the authorities to the wall so that they will appear as the persecuted.

Given pakatan's various wins in the many by-elections held over the last three years how can they still claim that elections are rigged? To me, they appear power hungry. No amount of victory in any election is good enough unless they win. And to assume that they always have the support is arrogant and somewhat stupid. Sure plenty attend ceramahs but ceramahs do not equal votes. I myself attended pakatan ceramah's during the campaign period of GE 2008 yet me and those like me refused to cast our votes. Pakatan is just drowning itself in the sewerage of it's own dellusions of grandeur and media spinning.

With all that said. The King has granted pakatan via their proxy ambiga an audience. If they are anywhere near being sincere about handing over a memorandum to His Majesty citing the need for electoral reforms, they would have done so. Their main goal is chaos, chaos and more chaos. Don't be fooled and don't be mislead. It is not about electoral reforms anymore. It is about intolerance and tension that they themselves will fan to create chaos. From chaos comes disruption and with disruption comes weakness. That is their goal. Let us be level headed Malaysians as we have always been and take our dissatisfaction to the ballot boxes (or not if abstaining). No need to march the streets lah....

--
Sent from my mobile device

Sunday, May 29, 2011

Lynas Kuantan and the IAEA

This just in:

IAEA expert panel will not be involved in policy discussions


Kuala Lumpur, Sunday: The IAEA expert panel investigating the health
and safety aspects of the Lynas plant began its work in Malaysia today
with a briefing on the project by Malaysian technical officials.

Panel leader, Dr. Tero Varjoranta, said the panel will review the
radiation safety aspects of the facility in relation to relevant
international radiation safety standards and good practices.

"The team will provide an independent expert opinion to the Malaysian
Government," he added.

"The mission is technical in nature and has no mandate to, and
therefore will not engage in policy type of discussions," Dr.
Varjoranta stressed.

He explained that the work of the panel will be focussed on gathering
information and receiving submissions from interested parties and
members of the public.

He said that it is the standard practice of IAEA missions such as this
to obtain its information in closed door sessions, and not in town
hall-type of meetings.

The team is in Malaysia at the invitation of the Malaysian Government.
Apart from Dr. Tero, the panel consists of nine professionals of
various disciplines from Canada, Finland, India, Italy, the
Netherlands, UK, and the Vienna-based IAEA. Four of them are from the
IAEA, and the other 5 are consultants from member countries.

While here, the panel will meet with government officials, Lynas
staff, residents and other members of the public. They will also visit
the project site.

The team will complete its work in Malaysia on June 3 and is expected
to submit its findings and recommendations to the Malaysian Government
by the end of June 2011.

####

Ministry of International Trade and Industry
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
29 May 2011

****

I think Fuziah Salleh should hold her horses, or will she work up
public sentiment a-la street protest pkr style? Don't be so
predictable lah. Forget about political milage for a change and let
experts do their jobs. Can?


--
Sent from my mobile device

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Arab = Pious? Really?

Of late there seems to be a shift in the Malay trend of naming
children. The majority of which seem to be heading towards the Arabs.
Somehow, today's culture sees Arabization as a means to overcompensate
for a void in their lives they start naming their newborns with funny
sounding names that the letter "A" spelt with an apostrophe to stress
on the "'ain" sound a-la Arabs. Then some even go as far a as
translating Arabic words into Malay to get a so-called "'afdal"
meaning to their Kids' names....

Hello! Reality check please.... Names do not ensure or even remotely
determine the outcome of one's morals. I have personally met several
chaps with whose names have "Mohamed", "Ahmad", "Abdullah", as well as
those who are named after Muslim Prophets who are actually drunkards,
whore house regular customers, druggies and what nots. I'm not saying
that naming them that way is bad. It's just that I am of the opinion
that how Parents raise their Children, the environment they grow up
in, their peers, Schooling are all determinants in ensuring how and
what a person turns out to be.

My grouse is with some people. They have this overbearing sense of
kampungness that they constantly try to instill into my Children.
While I have no particular qualms with kampung people, I just do not
want my Children growing up into one. While my own ancestry, one that
I am proud of, originated from the very same rice fields as that of
some people, it does not mean that we must constantly be in some kind
of peasant state of mind to be a better Muslim.

As badly as Bahasa Melayu has evolved into some kind of English
dictionary rip-off with it's constant poaching of English and Arabic
words, so too has Malay culture, albeit by poaching, cultures and
traditions of the Arabs, namely the naming of Children.

While many find that it is somewhat of plus point to name one's Child
like an Arabic bedouine, I do not see the point. Does it make them
better? Smarter? Pious? NO! So what if I name my Children after some
Gaelcian name? What's wrong with that? Have they ever wondered that
maybe some of us have plans? Some of us intend to emmigrate to a better
place when time and resources permit? That the naming of one's
Children are in line with one's potential future plans of moving out of this country? Some of us do have plans and
goals in life.

While I have this sense of attachment to some Nordic, Gaelic and
whatever distant culture's names, thanks to my own exposure to
different cultures, places and whatnots growing up in different
countries, does that make my Children less Muslim? For example, my
Spouse's sibling is married to a foreigner. Their children all live in
some distant white man's fantasy heaven. They all have Malay names but
none of them have their genital organs circumsized. So names are but
mere facades. They may appear more Muslim in name, perhaps for the
benefit of the kampungfolk they meet once of twice a year but
otherwise they are, bar pork and alcohol, no more Muslim than the
white men in their home country.

To me, if you carry the Prophet's name, do not use it in shame. I have
decided to move away from the standard Malay naming scheme of things
simply because I think it is hypocritical. Names like "Danial" are
accepted as Malay names when it is clearly of some mat salleh origin.
Whereas some tounguetwister names like that of my Children's are
frowned upon simply because they cannot pronounce it. Well, too bad!
If you people cannot speak English, French, Spanish or
whatever that's your problem. Don't make it mine.

I have come to the conclusion that people will say and do whatever the
hell they want, you can't stop them. Fine. But do not impose your
values on me when I clearly do not impose mine on you. We can talk,
discuss, and whatever for the sake of intellectual discourse but at
the end of the day, values are what makes us. For example, lying about
your whereabouts may seem acceptable to some under the guise of "tipu
sunat" (a man made way to legitimize lying on the basis of a small lie
created to prevent a much bigger disaster), to others lying is lying.
There are no exceptions to it.

Well, I have virtually given up with a lot of people on this naming
issue simply because I feel that they are invading my personal space
when it comes to my Spouse & Children. To me that is a line no one
should cross, regardless of whatever favours one may have granted to
us before, that is a line that must never and should never be crossed.
Again, it is a matter of values. One's value system is highly
subjective. A culture that has a phrase like "jaga tepi kain orang" is
hardly one that can sit idly by and watch others be non-conformists.
To hell with that, don't like it? Don't watch it!

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Second Guesses: How much longer do we need to feed an old man's ego?

Just heard.... and it's bad.

The so called 'crown jewel' of the national car industry, the
overprotected child of the nation (or more like overprotected child of
an old man and his ego) has hit it bad this year.

Higher revenue but a big drop in net profits 58.15% drop in profits
from 2009 but revenue grew 39%.

Something is not right here. I don't care if they spent a lot in
Rebranding but I suspect their UK based 'offspring' is sucking up a
lot of money. That and also is not so efficient supply chain perhaps.

If I was on the board of directors, the CEO would go. Chairman too has
to be accountable.... But that's me and believe me accountability is
hard to come by these days.

If you asked me, time we moved on and dumped the failed company. Sell
it off, cut our losses and spend on something more productive like a
well linked and integrated rail based public transport network. Enough
is enough, people's pockets are being burnt just to fuel the man's
ego.

--
Sent from my mobile device